PhD course in the Stockholm Doctoral Program, joint with Lars Ljungqvist.
SU’s official course page with links to syllabus and schedule. Notes (December 1, 2009). Problem sets are administered by the TA, Alex Schmitt (alex.schmitt@ne.su.se).
PhD course in the Stockholm Doctoral Program, joint with Lars Ljungqvist.
SU’s official course page with links to syllabus and schedule. Notes (December 1, 2009). Problem sets are administered by the TA, Alex Schmitt (alex.schmitt@ne.su.se).
MA course at the University of Bern.
Lectures and exercises follow these notes (December 1, 2009). Dates and times: Wed 10-12 and 14-16. Rooms: See university course site. Exam date, time, location: December 16, 2009; 14-16; A 003 UniS, Schanzeneckstrasse 1. Last year’s exam. Office hours arranged individually, after the lectures.
Why study this material? Some observers claim that the recent crisis points to a failure of economics and in particular, macroeconomics. It is argued that macroeconomic models are based on unrealistic assumptions and that modelers are driven by a desire to build abstract, formally appealing rather than empirically relevant models. Much of this criticism is unwarranted and reflects ignorance about the state of economic research. The modeling kit of economists far exceeds the baseline, frictionless models that are taught at the entry level of Master or PhD studies and against much of the current criticism is directed. For example, contractual or informational frictions—central to understanding the recent crisis—are the focus of a significant body of research in macroeconomics and other fields, past and present. Good Master or PhD programs teach models focusing on such frictions at the advanced level. But for students to be able to follow richer models with such “realistic” frictions, they must be familiar with the basic concepts, and these basic concepts are best taught in the context of simple, to-the-point baseline models. One may criticize the selection of models taught in advanced Master or PhD courses (as does Paul Krugman in the New York Times); the more fundamental critique against economics and in particular, macroeconomics does not make much sense.
Willem Buiter argues in favour of negative nominal interest rates in his FT maverecon blog. He identifies the bearer security nature of currency (whose owner remains anonymous) as the fundamental cause of the zero lower bound on nominal interest rates and discusses three possible strategies to relax the lower bound.
First, to abolish currency. As a consequence, central bank seignorage might fall and criminals would need to find new stores of value that guarantee anonymity. Limited privacy could be preserved by ‘cash-on-a-chip cards’ and for practicality reasons, small denominations could be kept. The price of the remaining cash expressed in terms of electronic money would fluctuate, however.
Second, to tax currency. Since cash can be held anonymously, this poses difficult incentive problems. It could be done but would be complicated and costly.
Third, to unbundle two functions of money, namely the medium of exchange/means of payment function on the one hand and the numéraire/unit of account function on the other. Suppose that there are two dollars, one unit of account dollar or “dollar” and one medium of exchange dollar or “m-dollar” (Buiter talks of “rallods” rather than m-dollars). Central bank reserves constitute dollars and might pay positive or negative interest while cash constitutes m-dollars and does not pay interest (or at least not negative interest). Monetary policy is conducted as usual by setting interest rates on dollars. In addition, the stock of m-dollars is fixed by the central bank, letting the market determine the exchange rate between dollars and m-dollars; or the central bank fixes an exchange rate between the dollar and m-dollar and elastically supplies m-dollars at this rate. In either case, the exchange rate will typically differ from unity and vary over time, in contrast to the current situation. Zero interest on the m-dollar and non-zero (positive or negative) interest on the dollar are consistent with no-arbitrage as long as the appreciation or depreciation of m-dollars relative to dollars compensates for the interest rate differential. For instance, if the central bank sets a negative interest rate on dollars, then the price of m-dollars (which pay zero interest) expressed in terms of dollars must fall over time that is, m-dollars must depreciate relative to dollars.
According to Buiter the third strategy suffers from just one possible problem: If for some reason, the numéraire ‘followed the currency’ and people started to quote prices in m-dollars then nothing would have been gained. But he argues that the government has means to coordinate society on using a specific money as unit of account, for instance by requiring taxes to be paid in that money (that is, in dollars rather than m-dollars).
Buiter refers to contributions by Eisler (1932), Goodfriend (2000), Buiter and Panigirtzoglou (2001, 2003), Davies (2004), Buiter (2004, 2007) as well as Mankiw’s blog post (April 19) on a graduate student proposal to depreciate cash by means of a lottery.
In another blog post a few days later, Buiter offers further discussion and a rather sarcastic comment on option two:
Taxing currency will, I am afraid, remain rather intrusive and administratively cumbersome. This may of course recommend it to some of our leaders.
He also notes that Charles Goodhart has been talking for years about the lottery proposal by Gregory Mankiw’s graduate student. And he points out that this proposal is not fool proof: Even when a lottery rendered bank notes with a specific last digit in their serial number “officially” worthless people might still continue to value them; confiscation threats etc. might therefore be needed in addition to the lottery in order to sustain the scheme.
The new edition features an interview with Hyun Shin on “Leverage.” PDF.
PhD course in the Stockholm Doctoral Program, joint with Lars Ljungqvist.
SU’s official course page with links to syllabus and schedule. Notes (February 5, 2009). Problem sets are administered by the TA, Abdulaziz Behiru Shifa (abdulaziz.shifa@ne.su.se).
Lectures in PhD course in the Swiss Program for Beginning Doctoral Students in Economics at the Study Center Gerzensee.
CEPR Discussion Paper 7093, December 2008. PDF.
We analyze how sovereign risk paired with social costs of default shapes the maturity structure of public debt. A government without commitment power balances benefits of default, due to tax savings, and costs, due to output losses. Debt issuance affects subsequent default and rollover decisions and thus, current debt prices. This induces welfare costs beyond the consumption smoothing benefits from the marginal unit of debt. The equilibrium choice of short- versus long-term debt issuance minimizes these welfare costs. Consistent with empirical evidence, closed-form solutions of the model predict an interior maturity structure with positive gross positions and a shortening of the maturity structure during times of crisis and low output. In simulations, the model replicates additional features of the data.
MA course at the University of Bern.
Lectures and exercises follow these notes (December 10, 2008). Dates; times; rooms (206 is in the main building, A222 is in UniS): September 17; 10-12, 14-15; 206 — September 24; 10-12, 14-15; A222 — October 1; 10-12, 13-15; A222 — October 8; 10-12, 13-15; A222 — October 15; 10-12, 13-15; A222 — October 22; 10-12, 13-15; A222 — October 29; 10-12, 14-15; 206 — November 5; 10-12, 13-15; A222 — November 26; 13-15; A222 — December 3; 10-12, 14-15; 206 — December 10; 10-12, 14-15; 206 — December 17; 10-12; 13-15; A222. Exam: Monday, January 5, 2009; 10-12; HS 205 (main building). Office hours arranged on an individual basis, after the lectures. University course site.
Journal of Monetary Economics 55(2), March 2008, with Martín Gonzalez-Eiras. PDF.
We analyze the effect of the projected demographic transition on the political support for social security, and equilibrium outcomes. Embedding a probabilistic-voting setup of electoral competition in the standard OLG model with capital accumulation, we find that intergenerational transfers arise in the absence of altruism, commitment, or trigger strategies. Closed-form solutions predict population ageing to lead to higher social security tax rates, a rising share of pensions in GDP, but eventually lower social security benefits per retiree. The response of equilibrium tax rates to demographic shocks reduces old-age consumption risk. Calibrated to match features of the U.S. economy, the model suggests that, in response to the projected demographic transition, social security tax rates will gradually increase to 16%. Other policies that distort labor supply will become less important; labor supply therefore will rise, in contrast with frequently voiced fears.
MA course at the University of Bern.
Notes (April 24) (will be updated and extended during the course). Information about rooms, schedule.
The new edition features an interview with Ricardo Caballero on “Global Imbalances.” PDF.
PhD course in the Stockholm Doctoral Program, joint with Lars Ljungqvist.
SU’s official course page with links to syllabus and schedule. “Real Macroeconomic Theory” by Per Krusell (Per is working on an update which might become available in the course of February 2008). Problem sets are posted on the website of Ettore Panetti.
Lectures in PhD course in the Swiss Program for Beginning Doctoral Students in Economics at the Study Center Gerzensee.
MA course at the University of Bern.
Notes (November 14) (will be updated and extended during the course). Information about rooms.
European Economic Review 51(1), January 2007. PDF.
A balanced budget requirement does not only prevent fiscal policy makers from smoothing tax distortions but also affects their preferred choice of government spending. The paper analyzes the conditions under which groups opposed to government spending might want to implement a balanced budget requirement in order to induce the government to spend less. It shows that relaxing a balanced budget requirement need not be associated with higher government spending.
The new edition features an interview with Larry Christiano on “Identifying the Effects of Monetary Policy.” PDF.
PhD course in the Stockholm Doctoral Program, joint with Lars Ljungqvist.
Syllabus. “Real Macroeconomic Theory” by Per Krusell.
Lectures in PhD course in the Swiss Program for Beginning Doctoral Students in Economics at the Study Center Gerzensee.
Kyklos 59(4), November 2006, with Assar Lindbeck. PDF.
… the paper makes two contributions, one analytical and one substantive. On the analytical side, we apply economic theory to identify rationales for the SGP and to develop adequate policy responses in light of these rationales. … On the substantive side, we highlight the “legalistic” perspective adopted in the SGP. …
MA course at the University of Lausanne.
The new edition features an interview with Sergio Rebelo on international macroeconomics. PDF.
The new edition features an interview with Jordi Gali on monetary theory. PDF.
PhD course in the Stockholm Doctoral Program, joint with Fabrizio Zilibotti.
SU’s official course page. Syllabus. Schedule. Approximately one topic per meeting. Problem sets: distributed and discussed by the TA, Giovanni Favara.